IT EVEN GOES FURTHER THAN GADENS - BUT IS SURELY MAINLY FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT.
I barely touch in my current efforts on the GADENS scenario - knowing that it largely relates to Zeimer in that he deliberately created COURT DOCUMENTS WHICH HE GADENS PASSED OFF TO OTHER PARTIES - THE SCHOOL - AS GENUINE!
IT does indeed have current gravitas - because ELIZABETH JENKINS WAS A PARTY TO IT BY DELIBERATELY TELLING US THAT SHE AGREED WITH ZEIMER THAT THE PAPERS WERE ''PRIVILEGED''
http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/cc1-july-9-to-yeshivah.html
This is criminal action and cover up of same by ZEIMER, JENKINS, GADENS ET AL.........................................................................................................
SO HERE WE HAVE THE SO CALLED CALLED ROUGH OVERVIEW RELATING TO THE BLOG CREATED TO WAREHOUSE MY CORRESPONDENCES WITH CATHOLIC CARE
THE ONLY THINGS MISSING ARE THEIR SO - CALLED YELLOW PAPERS WHICH ARE A SERIES OF 4 PAGES OF HELP - SHEETS SENT US AT THE BEGINNING BY CATHOLIC CARE.
MUCH OF MY COMMENTARIES THESE PAPERS ARE BASED ON THESE SHEETS - SIMPLY BECAUSE CATHOLIC CARE THEMSELVES REGARD IT AS BASED ON A SUMMARY OF THE FAMILY LAW.
THEIR SOLICITOR IS SO PROUD TO HAVE DRAFTED IT.
I have no reason to doubt any of this.
Some of my information used in my missives are based on verification and extrapolation from THE FAMILY COURT HELPLINE - AND TELEPHONE CALLS TO SAID HELPLINE IF IT WAS NECESSARY.
Sadly I know too much....
............................................................................................................
I start with most recent: EX my blog http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/
1: CC29
Monday, August 17, 2015
2 CC 29
See points 1 - 27! THERE ARE AT LEAST 27 DOT POINTS HERE,, SEE ITEM 12!!see the end -- There are so many points merely / broadly concentrating merely their legal eagle's lame defense of Elizabeth Jenkins as mentined in merely her first letter to us!
THIS IS ALL CHIMERIC: trying to prove that Jenkins' gravely - serious distortion of family Law WAS KOSHER!
See merely:
''First - sack the pair and dissociate yourself from the woman who wrote the adulterated tripe on 13 July. I decided to give you and your legal advisers a lesson in clear thinking and plainly demonstrate through only this epistle the plain rubbish in your communications are sadly inept.
OBLIQUE / RELEVANT POINTS
- Claiming innocence when panicked via above.
- Deliberately misrepresenting Family Law by LJenkins in her first letter.
- And defended by their solicitor knowing the chimeric nature of the pathetic non -defence. IN WRITING FOR GOODNESS SAKES!
- classical is their use of the privacy claim to break the other family law rules of ensuring all make a reasonable attempt at mediation! instead all we got was an enabling of her protection of Zeimer. One needs to have a look merely at my summary of what she told us that Zeimer told her as per the 20 items summary! [below] Hey - see how many of these below break the rules, the rules of common sense and very basic humanity. IT AIN'T FAMILY LAW - SHE PERVERTED IT.
- I have worked it out though. The woman is probably surely rapacious as well as everything else I have accused her of, SHE IS DETERMINED TO GET THROUGH [IN EVERY WAY!] AS MANY CLIENTS AS POSSIBLE - SO SHE HAS NO TIME FOR ANY OF THE BAREST ELEMENTS OF PROPRIETY! Sigh - how on earth does this remain 'dot - points?
ITEM 12
from above
''Never mind BY THE WAY: HOW DO YOU / DID YOU DARE SUGGEST IN THIS LETTER / EMAIL THAT YOU PLAINLY DO? SEE BELOW. HOW DARE YOU BE SO STUPID? AND / TO THINK I AM. ?TO THINK OTHERS READING THIS ARE! Indeed the very nature of saying to us what Zeimer said to you is plainly illegal in the strange chimeric world of CATHOLIC CARE. INNATELY YOU DID INDEED COMMUNICATE. AND PATHETICALLY YOU SEEK TO PROTECT YOURSELVES FROM THE MULTIPLE OUTRAGES THAT EVEN YOU CAN SEE INDUBITABLY FLOW FROM YOUR – SAY DELIBERATE IGNORING OF ABUSE OF CHILDREN – BREAKING OF THE LAW BY DOCUMENTS FRAUD BY ZEIMER’S SOLICITORS – BREAKING OF THE LAW IN ALLOWING ZEIMER TO PRE EMPT THE OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS IN NOT KEEPING TO THE COURT ACCESS GRANTED US – AND INDEED YOU HAVE TO ASK WHY THE SHAM OF ASKING TO SEE THE COURT ORDERS IF YOU DELIBERATELY IGNORED ZEIMER & CO DELIBERATE FRAUD? SEE BELOW. THERE IS NO END TO THIS DEFACTO CRIMINALITY FLOWING FROM ZEIMER – EXECUTED BY GADENS – AND FORMALLY WHITEWASHED BY CATHOLIC CARE. JENKINS: ALL VIA HER ‘’PRIVILEGED’’ CLAIM!! Shame on you all - all of you know all of this. All of you defend the indefensible.''
http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/cc-5-13-july-from-elizabeth-jenkins.html
- Tell me people: AS PER THIS EMAIL: WHO CAUSED HER TO IMPLY – AND EFFECTIVELY SEEK SUCCOUR IN – THE IDEA SUGGESTING / PRE EMPTING THAT THE MATTER IS BEING TAKEN TO THE COURTS BY US? IT IS NOT FOR YOU TO CLOAK YOURSELF WITH TAINTED CLAIMS OF INNOCENCE BASIS THAT YOU WILL NOT BE HELD TO ACCOUNT BECAUSE [MERELY] YOU THINK YOU CAN / WILL BE ABLE TO DENOUNCE MY ACCUSATIONS BASIS YOUR RUSE TO PROTECT YOURSELF VIA VARIOUS CHARADES OF CHICANERY. Phew. See your various buzzword excuses attempting legalaise to cover fraud!
- PRIVACY
- In the best interest of the child.
- Not our role to take sides
- Profoundness that is merely recondite.
- I WISH I HAD TIME TO LIST ALL YOUR PENURIOUS, EXIGUOUS CLAIMS OF SWEET INNOCENCE.
- You could for example be under investigation by parties not related to the Family Court.
- OR BY THE FAMILY COURT THEMSELVES! OR OTHER ENTITIES!!!!
- ARE YOU SERIOUSLY SUGGESTING THAT YOU WILL NOT HAVE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS IF YOU MERELY SHOW A 'NICE FACE' TO THE INVESTIGATORS IN WHATEVER FORUMS MY PROCESSES FINISH IN? AND THERE ARE PLENTY....
- OR FOR EXAMPLE: MERELY CONTEMPLATE THAT THE ATTORNEY - GENERAL MAY 'HEAR' OF THIS FIASCO - SEVERE UNDERSTATEMENT!!! More like a tragedy! HOW DO YOU GO REFUSING TO ANSWER THE AG'S STAFF? PROSECUTORS?YOU PEOPLE AND ZEIMER HAVE ACTED IN A WAY THAT MUST ELICIT INTEREST FROM VARIOUS LAW – BASED ENTITIES! THUS YOUR FEAR EXPRESSED BY YOU VIA ACCIDENTAL RELEASE TO ME OF YOUR RESPONSE FROM JILL!!
- AND OTHER ENTITIES WILL BE INVOLVED.
- BY THE WAY: HOW DO YOU / DID YOU DARE SUGGEST IN THIS LETTER / EMAIL THAT YOU PLAINLY DO? SEE BELOW. HOW DARE YOU BE SO STUPID? AND / TO THINK I AM. ?TO THINK OTHERS READING THIS ARE! Indeed the very nature of saying to us what Zeimer said to you is plainly illegal in the strange chimeric world of CATHOLIC CARE. INNATELY YOU DID INDEED COMMUNICATE. AND PATHETICALLY YOU SEEK TO PROTECT YOURSELVES FROM THE MULTIPLE OUTRAGES THAT EVEN YOU CAN SEE INDUBITABLY FLOW FROM YOUR – SAY DELIBERATE IGNORING OF ABUSE OF CHILDREN – BREAKING OF THE LAW BY DOCUMENTS FRAUD BY ZEIMER’S SOLICITORS – BREAKING OF THE LAW IN ALLOWING ZEIMER TO PRE EMPT THE OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS IN NOT KEEPING TO THE COURT ACCESS GRANTED US – AND INDEED YOU HAVE TO ASK WHY THE SHAM OF ASKING TO SEE THE COURT ORDERS IF YOU DELIBERATELY IGNORED ZEIMER & CO DELIBERATE FRAUD? SEE BELOW. THERE IS NO END TO THIS DEFACTO CRIMINALITY FLOWING FROM ZEIMER – EXECUTED BY GADENS – AND FORMALLY WHITEWASHED BY CATHOLIC CARE. JENKINS: ALL VIA HER ‘’PRIVILEGED’’ CLAIM!! Shame on you all - all of you know all of this. All of you defend the indefensible.
- Shame is the wrong word; on the one hand shame understates it, stupidity diminishes it – and the law lacerates it! AND THE PROCESSES OPEN TO ME WILL SURELY VINDICATE ALL THIS!
- AND IT WAS DULY PASSED ON TO US VERBALLY .. AND BAD LUCK FOR YOU IT WAS DULY RECORDED BY MYSELF IN THESE FILES: THE COROLARY ALSO INDICTS YE ALL - IN THAT NOTHING I HAVE WRITTEN CAN BE DENIED! Make sure you understand this next time you decide on defacto criminality: attempt to deny the worst aspects – seek to ameliorate the average aspects by early admissions and surely hope and pray to whoever is your supreme authority that you never meet the likes of ME AGAIN!!!!!!!
- I GO BACK TO JENKINS’ EMAIL. REALLY!.......’ANYTHING SAID ANY OF THE PARTIES CANNOT BE USED AT ANY TIME? UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES? GET REAL - THAT IS NOT BASICALLY TRUE! OR REMOTELY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SITUATION FLOWING FROM MERELY THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ELSE! SIMPLY, ALSO - CANNOT BE TRUE! SURELY SO. Probably the worst is the infantile idea arising from the fact that YOU DARE NOT VERIFY WHAT ONE OR OTHER PARTIES SAID IN THEIR COMMUNICATION TO EACH OTHER! OH: BY THE WAY .....HAVING FAILED TO DENY MY DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE PLAINLY TRUE!! SEE 16 here:
- http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/cc-july-12.html
- AND THE MOST ABSURD: THE VERY IDEA THAT YOU THINK YOU WILL NOT BE ACCOUNTABLE BASIS THAT EVIDENCE EX THE INTERVIEW WILL NOT BE ADMISSIBLE IN COURT! EVEN IF PARTLY [ETHEREALLY, or 'NETHEREALLY' CORRECT - GIVEN THE MASSIVE OTHER PROTUBERANCES, YOU CANNOT HIDE FROM THE OTHER FRAUDS YOU HAVE ALLOWED UNDER YOUR WATCH.. AND ACCORDINGLY YOU ARE GUILTY OF GRAVELY MISREPRESENTING AND ABUSING THE LAW! SHAME ON YOU PEOPLE _ DO NOT PLAY THESE MALFEASANT GAMES WITH ME... AND THE LAW!
- AND: AMAZINGLY NOTHING EXAGGERATED! See the rubbish emanating in all seriousness from Liz Jenkins - quoting Zeimer: is this a demonstration of a ‘serious’ / INDEED ANY!!! attempt at mediation? AND THIS MEGA - LUNACY VALIDATED BY YOU!!! SEE YOUR OWN SO CALLED YELLOW PAPERS - quoted at length all herein and other communications. Pure humbug - and outrage which the law will not forgive! IS THERE ANY POINT IN POSTING HERE ANYTHING MORE?? I COULD EASILY....
- WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF? INDEED THIS MANIFEST FEAR OF CONFIRMING MATTERS THAT YOU HAVE NOT BEEN WILLING OR ABLE TO DENY IS PLAIN RISIBLE: IT IS SO PATHETICALLY TOO LATE FOR THAT!
- INDEED - YOUR INEPTNESS GOES TO EVERYTHING IMAGINABLE: DO YOU THINK I AM A TRIFLE EXAGGERATING? LOOK AT IT ANOTHER WAY: IF YOU HAD TRIED TO DENY ANYTHING OR EVERYTHING THAT NOW PLAINLY THREATENS YOU - TELL ME WHAT REMAINS OF WHAT DR Z SAID TO YOU?
- INDEED: you are a party to Zeimer's fraud: what has he over you? I really do not understand how you could be so 'careless' about your future.
- IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THIS IS A MERE CHARADE WHEREBY YOU ARE PATHETICALLY TRYING TO PROTECT YOURSELVES FROM SERIOUS CHARGES?
- EVEN IF THE SO - CALLED COMMUNICATION WAS DELIBERATELY SO SEQUESTERED BY THE RULES< THE PATHETIC WRITINGS BY CATHOLIC CARE WOULD HAVE BEEN MAKING SURE THAT NONE OF THE PARTIES COULD REALLY COMMUNICATE> THIS IS UNFORGIVEABLE. And a mere gently - expressed problem' sorry – this is repetition...
- LOOK AT THE LAME DEFENCE OF THIS BY NICK: IN HIS RECENT TORTUOUS IRRELEVANCY ON 10 AUGUST
- http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/cc-26-aug-11the-denouement-surely-with.html
- POSSIBLY THE WORST IS THAT YOU ALLOWED ZEIMER TO TAMPER WITH COURT DOCUMENTS - AND CALLED THE TAMPERED PAPERS THE CAUSES OF ACTION BY ZEIMER YOU ATTEMPTED TO PROTECT AS ''PRIVILEGED''! For information of fraud you allowed under your watch see the below for background.
- http://wilfullyblind.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/cc1-july-9-to-yeshivah.html
SO I leave you persons with this.
How can the Catholic Church be proud of what you did, allowed to be done, and worse - protected said fraud by trying all sorts of ruses to mislead me?
################
#####################
#####################
Zeimer and Gadens tampered with Court documents
They deliberately misrepresented the orders signed by both parties on the footsteps of The Family Court in February 2012.
My wife and I had an obscene intervention Order taken out against us in 2009. Then we won a miserable 4 hours per month access to our dead daughter's children after years of internicine battle in The Family Court after he managed various last - minute treacheries which were close to illegal.
Not being satisfied with this.....
And when Jenkins wrote in her letter to us that we should bring any Court orders - we told her thst not only did Zeimer fail to keep to his monthly legal obligations but also tampered / misrepresented these documents claiming we had no right to visit our grandchildren's school basis said agreement.
This unacceptable deliberate fraud was subject of outrageous correspondences with Gadens - Zeimer's lawyers, ourselves and The Legal Services Commixsio Services Commission.
All of them played ignorance of the subject matter and played me for a fool.
When Jenkins was told of Zeimer not even keeping to his monthly obligations - anda out THAT fraud, the woman was not even interested Oh, by the way she described the document that Zeimer refused that the school release as " privileged "
So breaking the law with tampering, not keeping to Court orders
TO BE CONTINUED WITH MY SUBMISSION TO THE A. GENERAL../.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.